News Briefing

China Orders Its Emigration Agents to Register, Reversing 2018 Deregulation

Aug 8, 2026News Briefingwww.imidaily.com

China’s State Council has reinstated a registration regime for all agencies that provide emigration, visa and other exit‑entry services. Premier Li Qiang signed Order No. 841 on 22 July; the rules take effect on 15 September, with a compliance window that runs until mid‑December for existing operators.

Who must register and the timetable

  • New agencies – must file with the local immigration authority within 15 days of establishment.
  • Existing agencies and staff – have 90 days from 15 September (mid‑December) to submit their filings.
  • Filing process – will be administered mainly online by the National Immigration Administration (NIA) in coordination with market regulators.
  • Free, non‑profit advice – policy counselling offered without a profit motive is excluded from the definition of “intermediary services.”

Minimum requirements for a filed agency (Article 8)

  • Legal establishment – the legal representative must have no criminal penalty for an intentional crime.
  • Staff qualifications – employees who interact directly with clients must be free of convictions for intentional crimes against national security, public safety or border administration and must possess working knowledge of exit‑entry law.
  • Financial and physical resources – agencies must have sufficient funds and premises proportionate to the services offered.
  • Internal controls – documented systems for personnel management, training, record retention, data security and compliance.
  • Overseas partner – agencies handling outbound work must already have a cooperation relationship with a relevant overseas service institution, evidenced by a signed letter of intent. This mirrors a 2001 requirement that was removed in the 2018 deregulation.
  • No minimum headcount – unlike the 2001 rules, the new order does not stipulate a minimum number of staff.

Restriction on foreign entities

  • Overseas enterprises and institutions are barred from providing exit‑entry intermediary services in China.
  • Foreign‑invested companies legally established in China, as well as Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan‑invested firms, may continue to operate.
  • The ban aligns with the 2001 Measures, which previously prohibited foreign institutions from obtaining operating permits for such services.

Conduct rules and reporting duties (Article 10)

  • Agencies may not publish false information, use exaggerated promotion, or assist clients in obtaining visas, residence permits or passports in violation of the law.
  • Leakage or unlawful sale of commercial secrets, personal data or case information is prohibited.
  • Providing services outside the scope of the filed registration constitutes a breach.
  • Agencies must refuse and promptly report any request from public officials, military personnel or similar clients to obtain foreign nationality or permanent residence in breach of regulations.

Penalties

Violation Fine (RMB) Additional sanctions
Failure to file or meet Article 8 conditions (minor) 5,000 – 10,000 Order to correct; possible suspension or closure
Failure to file or meet conditions (serious) 10,000 – 50,000 Permit or business‑license revocation
Conduct that disrupts exit‑entry administration 20,000 – 50,000 (or 1‑5 × illegal gains if ≥ 20,000) Confiscation of illegal gains
Responsible managers/staff (personal liability) 10,000 – 50,000 Personal fines; possible suspension or revocation of permits
Individual service providers (serious breach) Up to 5,000 Order to stop, confiscation of gains

Background: the regime being replaced

  • 2000‑2001 – Licensing introduced via State Council notice and Order No. 59; permits lasted five years, required annual inspection and a reserve deposit of at least RMB 500,000 (≈ US$74,000).
  • 2018 deregulation – Permits were separated from business licences; from 10 Nov 2018 local exit‑entry departments stopped accepting applications, existing permits lapsed, and deposits were refunded.
  • Market impact – Researchers estimated 4,857 – 27,238 intermediaries in 2019, 82 % of them under five years old. By June 2026, the NIA cites over 160,000 entities offering private‑purpose exit‑entry services, though the figure is acknowledged as incomplete.

Expanded exit‑ban provisions (Article 4)

  • Administrative detention for fraudulently obtaining travel documents or illegal border crossing – bans of 6 months to 3 years, counted from the end of the penalty.
  • Criminal activity abroad that harms national security or interests – same ban range, counted from the citizen’s return to China.
  • Export‑control or technology‑security violations – bans imposed with no specified time limit.
  • The deciding authority must notify the immigration authority and the individual in writing, except where disclosure could jeopardise national security or a criminal investigation.

Implications for overseas destination‑side firms

  • Foreign‑based program firms and licensed agents are not required to register themselves, but their Chinese counterparts must.
  • The outbound‑partner requirement in Article 8 now makes the existence of a documented referral or cooperation agreement part of the filing, prompting firms that previously operated without formal paperwork to formalise such arrangements.

Key compliance date: existing Chinese emigration agencies must complete their registration by mid‑December 2026, pending detailed filing procedures to be issued by the NIA.