Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: Seven Dumb New Taxes to Avoid with Dual Citizenship

Jan 5, 2021Video Briefing15:03Watch on YouTube

The fiscal climate in many Western nations is shifting toward more aggressive taxation of high‑net‑worth individuals. Several emerging tax concepts could affect entrepreneurs and investors, especially those with assets or income above a few million dollars. Holding a second residence—or, where possible, a second citizenship—provides flexibility to relocate tax domicile quickly and potentially avoid or mitigate these future levies.

1. Citizenship‑Based Taxation

  • Current examples: United States (global citizenship tax), Eritrea (flat diaspora tax).
  • Emerging trends: China, South Africa, and some European states are discussing similar rules that would require citizens to continue paying taxes after moving abroad, sometimes for a fixed period (e.g., three years).
  • Implication: Citizens of countries that adopt this model could face ongoing tax obligations regardless of residence. A second passport from a jurisdiction without citizenship‑based taxation can break the link.

2. Exit Tax

  • Mechanism: Tax on unrealized capital gains at the moment of expatriation. The U.S. imposes a “mark‑to‑market” exit tax on individuals who relinquish citizenship.
  • Potential expansion: Other nations are strengthening provisions that treat a change of tax home as a deemed disposition, triggering tax on accumulated assets.
  • Planning tip: Establish a secondary residence or citizenship before any exit‑tax legislation is enacted, allowing a swift move to a more favorable tax regime.

3. Wealth Tax

  • Recent enactments: Argentina introduced a one‑time levy on assets exceeding ≈ US $2.5 million.
  • Proposals elsewhere: Canada is debating an annual 1‑2 % levy on net worth above ≈ C$20 million; the UK and other European countries have floated similar ideas.
  • Context: Politicians often target wealth taxes as a response to public concerns about inequality, using the relatively small number of ultra‑rich individuals as an easy political target.
  • Effect on investors: A modest annual rate can be difficult to fund if assets are largely cash‑based, as generating the required return may be challenging in low‑interest environments.

4. Estate (Inheritance) Tax

  • U.S. outlook: Possible lowering of the exemption threshold, making more estates subject to tax.
  • Global perspective: Some countries have no estate tax at all, while others are considering introducing one to curb generational wealth accumulation.
  • Mitigation: Holding assets in jurisdictions with favorable inheritance rules or using charitable giving strategies can reduce exposure.

5. Universal Basic Income (UBI) and Related Levies

  • Pilot programs: Certain European regions are testing UBI schemes funded by general taxation.
  • Fiscal pressure: Funding UBI may lead governments to impose new levies—often framed as “special income taxes” or temporary surcharges on high earners.
  • Historical parallel: Ireland introduced a 2‑4 % levy during a recession to cover budget shortfalls. Similar measures could be applied to finance UBI.

6. Cryptocurrency Taxation

  • Regulatory movement: The European Union is working toward a harmonized framework for crypto taxation, moving from a regulatory gray zone to a more structured tax regime.
  • Risk: Jurisdictions that previously offered tax‑friendly treatment of crypto assets may tighten rules, affecting both capital gains and transaction reporting.
  • Actionable step: Identify crypto‑friendly jurisdictions and consider establishing residency there before broader EU or other international standards take effect.

7. Retroactive Taxation

  • Concept: Authorities could apply taxes to past periods, retroactively assessing wealth, income, or capital gains from years or even decades earlier.
  • Precedents: Some countries have used retroactive measures to collect taxes after policy changes, arguing that prior activities benefited from existing infrastructure.
  • Defensive posture: Maintaining a primary tax residence in a country with strong legal protections against retroactive taxation reduces the risk of unexpected liabilities.

Practical considerations for high‑net‑worth individuals

  • Maintain a secondary residence in a jurisdiction with stable, low‑tax policies. This enables rapid relocation if a new tax is announced.
  • Obtain a second citizenship from a country that does not impose citizenship‑based taxes, providing an additional layer of protection for assets and income.
  • Monitor legislative developments through reputable tax publications (e.g., OECD reports, national tax authority releases) to anticipate upcoming reforms.
  • Structure assets using entities or trusts in tax‑friendly jurisdictions, especially for crypto holdings and investment portfolios.
  • Plan for exit scenarios by keeping detailed records of asset valuations, which can reduce exposure to exit taxes and facilitate smoother transitions.

By staying informed and diversifying both residence and citizenship, wealthy entrepreneurs can better navigate the evolving global tax landscape and preserve the value they have built.