Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: The World’s 6 Fastest Improving Free Economies

Nov 19, 2020Video Briefing13:38Watch on YouTube

The Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom ranks nations on a 100‑point scale, grouping them into five tiers: Free, Mostly Free, Moderately Free, Mostly Unfree, and Repressed. While traditional “free” economies such as Singapore dominate the top tier, several lower‑tier countries are posting rapid gains, suggesting they could become the next hubs for investment, residency, or business expansion.

How the Index works

  • Scoring: 100 points total; the leading economies score around 89‑90.
  • Categories: Property rights, judicial effectiveness, government integrity, tax burden, regulatory efficiency, and trade freedom.
  • Tier definitions:
    • Free – only five countries (e.g., Singapore) qualify.
    • Mostly Free – includes the United States, Georgia, Lithuania, etc.
    • Moderately Free – many EU members with mixed business climates.
    • Mostly Unfree and Repressed – the least attractive for entrepreneurs.

Below are six countries that have moved up the rankings in the latest report, each gaining a notable number of points and showing concrete reforms.


Armenia – Rank 34 (Mostly Free)

  • Points gained: +2.9, one of the largest improvements among its peers.
  • Key reforms:
    • Strengthened property rights and judicial independence.
    • Anti‑corruption drive modeled after Georgia, improving government integrity.
    • Tax policy: Gradual reduction in corporate and dividend taxes; dividends now taxed more favorably.
  • Business climate: Easier company registration and lower government spending, creating a more attractive environment for foreign investors.

Kazakhstan – Rank 39 (Mostly Free)

  • Points gained: +4.2, the highest increase in the index for this year.
  • Key reforms:
    • Enhanced property rights and judicial efficiency.
    • Introduction of resident‑by‑investment programs to attract capital.
    • Diversification away from a resource‑dependent economy toward broader sectors.
    • Government efficiency drive aimed at reducing state involvement, echoing reforms seen in Georgia and the Baltic states.
  • Investment angle: Emerging opportunities in non‑energy industries and a more open trade regime.

Colombia – Rank 45 (Moderately Free)

  • Points gained: +1.9, moving the country toward the “mostly free” tier.
  • Key reforms:
    • Ongoing judicial reforms and a modest tax reduction agenda.
    • Efforts to improve business freedom and attract foreign direct investment.
  • Challenges: Migration pressures from Venezuela and lingering infrastructure gaps (e.g., limited ATM coverage) still affect ease of doing business.

Belarus – Rank 88 (Mostly Unfree)

  • Points gained: +3.8, notable for a country often in the news for political reasons.
  • Key reforms:
    • Simplified business start‑up procedures.
    • Low personal income tax (low teens) and moderate corporate tax rates.
    • Growing monetary freedoms and a welcoming stance toward crypto enterprises.
  • Target audience: Particularly attractive for cryptocurrency investors and single‑person entrepreneurs seeking low tax exposure, though the government remains cautious.

Madagascar – Rank 99 (Mostly Unfree)

  • Points gained: +3.9, placing the island nation just ahead of Greece’s “golden‑visa” tier.
  • Key reforms:
    • Positive sentiment from the government, emphasizing continued GDP growth.
    • Legal reforms aimed at attracting foreign investment and improving the investment climate.
  • Opportunity: Real‑estate and other sectors are opening to foreign capital, though the overall economic environment remains less developed than in higher‑ranked countries.

Uzbekistan – Rank 114 (Mostly Unfree)

  • Points gained: Not specified, but the country shows strong upward momentum.
  • Key reforms:
    • Adoption of a Georgian‑style reform agenda, including banking liberalization (e.g., TBC Bank’s entry).
    • GDP growth has surged, and liberal policies are being introduced across sectors.
    • Real‑estate: New ownership rules allow foreign buyers to purchase newer properties above a certain value threshold.
  • Currency note: The Uzbek som has weakened, making foreign real‑estate purchases relatively cheaper.
  • Outlook: While still behind the “mostly free” tier, Uzbekistan’s trajectory mirrors that of earlier success stories like Georgia and Singapore.

Practical considerations for investors and entrepreneurs

  • Match reforms to your business model: Countries with low corporate taxes (e.g., Armenia, Belarus) benefit asset‑heavy or profit‑repatriating enterprises, while jurisdictions improving judicial independence (e.g., Kazakhstan) favor long‑term investments.
  • Residency and citizenship pathways: Several of these nations are developing or already offer investment‑based residency programs, which can provide easier travel and tax planning options.
  • Risk assessment: Political stability, currency volatility, and regulatory consistency vary widely. For instance, Uzbekistan’s currency weakness lowers entry costs but may signal macro‑economic risk.
  • Administrative burden: Even in “mostly free” economies, paperwork and compliance can differ dramatically from the United States or the United Kingdom. Smaller investors often prefer jurisdictions with streamlined incorporation processes and predictable tax enforcement.
  • Diversification: Using the Index as a screening tool can help identify emerging markets for diversification, but it should be complemented with on‑the‑ground due diligence, especially regarding local legal frameworks and market demand.

Bottom line: The Heritage Foundation’s Index highlights a set of countries—Armenia, Kazakhstan, Colombia, Belarus, Madagascar, and Uzbekistan—that are improving their economic freedom scores at a pace that outstrips many traditionally “free” economies. Their reforms in property rights, taxation, judicial efficiency, and government transparency create tangible opportunities for investors, entrepreneurs, and digital nomads willing to navigate the specific risks and regulatory environments of each market.