Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: Like NYC, but Hate High Taxes? Move HERE…

Sep 18, 2019Video Briefing8:18Watch on YouTube

Living in iconic, high‑cost cities often means paying steep taxes and facing restrictive regulations. For many entrepreneurs and digital nomads, the appeal of a well‑known “brand” city can be matched—or even surpassed—by lesser‑known locales that offer comparable amenities, a similar lifestyle, and a far friendlier tax environment.

New York City → Hong Kong

  • Lifestyle: Both are global financial hubs with bustling streets, extensive public transport, and a mix of cultures. Hong Kong adds a tropical climate and a compact island setting.
  • Tax advantage: Hong Kong’s territorial tax system taxes only locally‑sourced income, resulting in a headline corporate tax rate of 16.5 % and personal tax rates that top out at 17 %, far lower than the combined federal, state, and city taxes in New York.
  • Business climate: The city’s “make money, keep more of your money” slogan reflects a regulatory environment that encourages profit retention and rapid capital movement.

Los Angeles → Mexico City

  • Lifestyle: Mexico City mirrors Los Angeles in size and cultural vibrancy, with upscale suburban neighborhoods, a warm climate, and a thriving culinary scene.
  • Cost & taxes: Living costs—including housing and everyday expenses—are considerably lower. Mexico’s personal income tax rates range from 1.92 % to 35 % (progressive), but many expatriates can benefit from the “non‑resident” regime, which taxes only Mexican‑source income.
  • Business friendliness: Compared with California’s high corporate tax (8.84 % state) and extensive regulations, Mexico offers a more streamlined process for setting up companies and lower overall tax burdens.

London → Singapore

  • Lifestyle: Singapore provides a tropical, high‑density urban environment with world‑class infrastructure, safety, and a multicultural population—paralleling London’s global appeal.
  • Tax advantage: Personal income tax caps at 22 % (versus the UK’s 45 % top rate) and corporate tax is a flat 17 %, with numerous incentives for qualifying activities.
  • Business climate: The city‑state’s pro‑business policies, strong rule of law, and strategic location in Asia make it a compelling alternative for firms seeking a “London‑like” hub without the high cost of living.

Miami → Warm‑climate alternatives

  • Caribbean islands: Nations such as the Bahamas, Cayman Islands, and Barbados combine beach‑side living with favorable tax regimes—often no capital gains, inheritance, or income tax for non‑residents.
  • Lisbon, Portugal: Offers a “Non‑Habitual Resident” regime that can grant a 20 % flat tax on certain foreign‑sourced income for ten years, though qualifying can be complex.
  • Phuket, Thailand: Low cost of living, tropical climate, and a growing expat community; personal income tax rates are progressive up to 35 %, but many retirees and digital nomads benefit from treaty exemptions.
  • Barcelona, Spain: While culturally vibrant, Spain’s personal tax rates can exceed 45 % and the cost of living is higher than many Caribbean options, making it less tax‑friendly for year‑round residency.

Sydney → Dubai Marina

  • Lifestyle: Dubai Marina replicates Sydney’s waterfront living, with upscale apartments, dining, and leisure amenities, but in a desert climate that remains warm year‑round.
  • Tax advantage: The United Arab Emirates imposes no personal income tax, no capital gains tax, and low corporate tax (currently 9 % on profits exceeding AED 375,000).
  • Business climate: Free‑zone structures allow 100 % foreign ownership, full repatriation of profits, and streamlined licensing—contrasting sharply with Australia’s high personal tax rates (up to 45 %) and extensive regulations on goods such as cigarettes and alcohol.

Additional viable alternatives

  • Bogotá, Colombia: Growing tech scene, moderate cost of living, and a personal tax rate that caps at 33 % for residents.
  • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Often described as an “edgy” version of London, offering a strategic location in Southeast Asia, a flat 24 % corporate tax, and a relatively low personal tax ceiling of 30 %.
  • Melbourne → Milan: For those drawn to Melbourne’s cultural vibe, Milan provides comparable European sophistication with Italy’s corporate tax at 24 % and personal rates up to 43 %, though the cost of living can be higher.

When evaluating a potential city swap, consider the following criteria:

  • Tax structure: Territorial vs. worldwide taxation, corporate rates, and available exemptions for expatriates.
  • Cost of living: Housing, utilities, food, and transportation costs relative to income expectations.
  • Regulatory environment: Ease of company formation, repatriation of profits, and compliance burdens.
  • Lifestyle fit: Climate, cultural amenities, language, and proximity to international travel hubs.

By aligning these factors, high‑net‑worth individuals and entrepreneurs can maintain—or even improve—the quality of life associated with “brand” cities while substantially reducing tax liabilities and living expenses.