Video Briefing

The Wandering Investor: Impact of Suez Canal and Panama Canal Crises – with Calvin

Jan 9, 2024Video Briefing12:25Watch on YouTube

The simultaneous slowdown of the Panama and Suez canals is creating a rare, large‑scale bottleneck for global shipping, driving up freight costs and extending delivery times across multiple industries.

Panama Canal constraints

  • Throughput drop: Roughly 50 % of the canal’s capacity is currently unavailable.
  • Root cause: Gatun Lake, the freshwater reservoir that supplies water to the lock system, is at historically low levels. The lake must remain fresh to avoid contaminating the adjacent salt‑water seas, limiting the amount of water that can be used for lock operations.
  • Contributing factors:
    • The 2016 canal expansion, which added larger lock chambers, increased water demand per transit.
    • Seasonal drought intensified by El Niño, creating the lowest water levels on record.
  • Economic response: Panama has raised transit fees and introduced an auction system for lock slots, allowing shippers to bid for priority passage.
  • Alternative route: Vessels that cannot secure a slot must sail around Cape Horn, adding several weeks to a month of travel time.

Suez Canal disruptions

  • Throughput drop: Container traffic is down roughly 70 % on average, with daily reductions sometimes reaching 90 %.
  • Security threat: Houthi rebels in Yemen, backed by Iran, have declared they will block any vessel with ties to Israel from the Red Sea, the southern entrance to the canal. Their capability includes firing ballistic missiles at moving ships—a first for the group.
  • Alternative route: Similar to the Panama situation, ships must detour around the Cape of Good Hope, extending voyages by a few weeks to a month depending on speed.

Broader impact on global trade

  • Freight rates: Longer routes and limited canal capacity are pushing freight prices higher across all cargo categories.
  • Supply‑chain delays: Parts that previously took three weeks to arrive can now require six weeks, creating cascading delays for manufacturers and their customers.
  • Commodity markets: Energy and raw‑material traders are especially vulnerable; uncertainty over canal auction schedules makes planning and pricing more difficult.
  • Regional effects: Egypt, which relies on Suez‑related revenues to offset a sizable current‑account deficit, faces additional fiscal pressure as canal traffic declines.

Historical perspective

  • During the 1967‑1975 closure of the Suez Canal, the oil‑transport industry responded by building ultra‑large crude carriers (ULCCs). The global ULCC fleet grew by approximately 15 × in that period, illustrating how prolonged canal closures can reshape vessel design and trade routes.

Potential long‑term shifts

  • Reshoring considerations: Higher shipping costs may encourage some manufacturers to relocate production closer to end markets (e.g., the United States, Mexico, Brazil). However, building the necessary industrial capacity—factories, rail, pipelines—requires years, and many components (electronics, specialized steel, cement) are no longer produced domestically at scale.
  • Structural outlook: While short‑term freight inflation is clear, a rapid move away from globalized supply chains is unlikely. The long‑term trend toward reshoring could be structurally bearish for large‑ship operators and for economies that depend on export‑driven manufacturing.

Key takeaways for shippers and investors

  • Monitor Panama Canal auction results and fee adjustments closely; they directly affect transit timing and cost.
  • Assess alternative routing risks, especially for time‑sensitive cargo, and factor in the additional weeks of travel around Africa or South America.
  • Consider the broader macroeconomic implications: higher freight costs feed into consumer price inflation and may pressure profit margins for industries reliant on just‑in‑time inventory.
  • Evaluate exposure to companies that own or operate large container fleets, as they may benefit from higher rates but also face capacity constraints.

The concurrent reduction in throughput at both of the world’s major maritime shortcuts signals a period of heightened volatility for global logistics, with ripple effects that could reshape trade patterns for years to come.