Video Briefing

Wealthy Expat: Enter USA Easily: Best Citizenships for US Visa Access

Oct 4, 2026Video Briefing8:47Watch on YouTube

Wealthy individuals often pursue citizenship‑by‑investment (CBI) programs to gain greater travel freedom, protect assets, and create a fallback option if their home country becomes hostile. One key consideration is the likelihood of obtaining a U.S. visitor or business visa with the new passport. Recent data on 2025 visa refusal rates shows stark differences among CBI jurisdictions.

Visa refusal rates by country (visitor/business visas)

Region / Country Refusal rate
Caribbean CBI programs
Dominica 35 %
St. Kitts & Nevis 37 %
Antigua & Barbuda 38 %
Grenada 44 %
Turkey (CBI) 22.25 %
Vanuatu (CBI) 47 %
Egypt (CBI) ~48 %
Jordan (CBI) ~57 %
Georgia (CBI) 45.5 %
Serbia (citizenship by exception) 15.20 %
European Union (visa‑free ESTA)
Germany, Sweden, etc. Visa‑free (ESTA)
Bulgaria 5 %
Romania 8.41 %
Other low‑refusal countries
Uruguay 2.59 %
Argentina 7.47 %
Malta (EU, visa‑free ESTA) Visa‑free (ESTA)

Countries marked “visa‑free” allow entry to the United States via the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) rather than a traditional visa.

Why the differences matter

  • Higher refusal rates (35 %–57 %) in many Caribbean and some non‑EU programs mean applicants face roughly a one‑in‑two chance of being denied a U.S. visa, even when they meet financial thresholds.
  • Lower refusal rates (under 10 %) in EU member states and a few non‑EU nations (e.g., Uruguay, Serbia) suggest a more favorable consular assessment.
  • The U.S. and the European Union have signaled that CBI passports may be subject to stricter scrutiny, potentially reducing visa‑free privileges for some programs (e.g., Vanuatu lost ESTA eligibility a few years ago).

Factors that influence U.S. visa outcomes

Consular officers evaluate more than the passport itself:

  • Established ties: employment, business ownership, or long‑term residence in the passport‑issuing country.
  • Financial resources: proof of sufficient funds to cover the U.S. stay.
  • Family and property: ownership of a home, family members remaining in the home country, or other commitments that indicate a return intention.
  • Travel history: frequent, well‑documented trips can improve credibility, whereas “willy‑nilly” applications (e.g., many low‑budget attempts) raise suspicion.

Practical considerations for selecting a second citizenship

  • Prioritize low refusal rates if U.S. travel is a primary goal. Serbia (15 %) and Bulgaria (5 %) outperform most Caribbean options.
  • Assess the broader visa landscape: Even with a low U.S. refusal rate, other destinations (Schengen, UK, Canada) may have different requirements.
  • Plan for tangible ties: Investing in real estate, establishing a local business, or maintaining a permanent residence strengthens the case for future visa applications.
  • Monitor policy changes: Both the U.S. and the EU periodically adjust entry rules for CBI passports; staying informed can prevent unexpected restrictions.

Bottom line

When the objective is reliable access to the United States, the choice of second citizenship matters. Programs with high U.S. visa refusal rates—particularly many Caribbean CBI schemes—pose a significant risk. Countries with established EU membership or low refusal percentages, such as Bulgaria, Romania, Uruguay, or Serbia (via citizenship by exception), offer a more dependable pathway, provided applicants can demonstrate genuine ties and sufficient financial stability.

Latest video briefings

Recent video briefings on residence, citizenship, tax, migration, passports, and international living.