Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: The Case for Getting a BAD Passport

Apr 9, 2022Video Briefing11:40Watch on YouTube

Second citizenships are often marketed for their visa‑free access to the European Union, but for many Western investors and entrepreneurs the ability to travel to Europe may be a secondary concern. A broader view of passport value—tax treatment, personal freedom, investment opportunities, and resilience to future EU policy changes—can reveal useful alternatives that do not grant Schengen entry.

Why visa‑free Europe may be less critical

  • Primary nationality remains unchanged – Most Western applicants keep their original passport (e.g., U.S., Canadian) and use the second one for specific purposes such as tax planning or residency.
  • EU visa‑free access is increasingly fragile – The EU has begun tightening rules for citizenship‑by‑investment programs, and several countries (e.g., Vanuatu) have already lost visa‑free privileges for passports issued after 2015.
  • Electronic travel authorisations (ETIAS) – Similar to the U.S. ESTA, Europe is moving toward an online authorisation system that will add cost and administrative steps even for Schengen‑eligible passports.

Passports that offer utility without EU travel

Passport Typical acquisition route Visa‑free coverage (key regions) Notable constraints
Armenian Citizenship by descent (requires proof of Armenian ancestry) Serbia, other Balkan states; some Central Asian and South American countries No visa‑free access to the Schengen Area
Turkish Investment (e.g., property purchase) Large swathes of Africa, Southeast Asia, the Americas (Mexico, Caribbean) No Schengen access; limited to countries that do not require EU reciprocity
Caribbean (e.g., St. Lucia, Antigua & Barbuda) Investment or donation programs Broad coverage in the Caribbean, parts of Africa and Asia; many have EU access but can be restricted by future EU policy Often marketed for EU travel, but the real advantage lies in tax‑friendly regimes and flexible residency options

Practical considerations when choosing a non‑EU passport

  1. Eligibility and speed – Descent‑based citizenship (e.g., Armenia) can be obtained quickly and at low cost if you can document ancestry. Investment routes (Turkey, Caribbean) typically require a financial commitment and a longer processing time.
  2. Tax implications – Some jurisdictions (e.g., Antigua & Barbuda) offer favorable tax regimes for non‑resident citizens, while others may impose taxes on worldwide income. Evaluate the interaction with your primary tax residency.
  3. Residency flexibility – A second passport can simplify obtaining residence permits in countries that otherwise require extensive documentation. For example, an Armenian passport can expedite police‑report‑based applications for certain residency programs.
  4. Future EU restrictions – Relying on a passport solely for Schengen travel may become problematic if the EU imposes stricter reciprocity or introduces ETIAS‑type authorisations. Diversifying your passport portfolio reduces exposure to such policy shifts.
  5. Travel convenience vs. strategic value – If you already hold a strong passport (U.S., Canadian) that provides ample visa‑free travel, the incremental benefit of a second passport with limited EU access may be outweighed by its tax or investment advantages.

Risks and caveats

  • Misuse of visa‑free periods – Attempting to “reset” the 90‑day Schengen allowance by swapping passports is generally prohibited and can lead to entry bans.
  • Changing international norms – While some countries (e.g., Turkey) may maintain broad global access, they could face pressure from the EU or other blocs to tighten their programs.
  • Residency program dependencies – Some citizenship‑by‑investment schemes are tied to specific residency options; if those programs are altered or cancelled, the utility of the passport may diminish.
  • Legal compliance – Ensure that any dual‑ or triple‑citizenship strategy complies with the laws of your primary country of residence, especially regarding tax reporting and military obligations.

Decision framework

  1. Define primary goals – Is the focus tax optimisation, investment diversification, or personal freedom? If EU travel is not a core need, prioritize passports that excel in the identified area.
  2. Assess eligibility – Determine whether you qualify for descent‑based citizenship (e.g., Armenian) or are prepared for an investment route (e.g., Turkish).
  3. Map visa‑free coverage – List the regions you most frequently travel to and compare the passport’s access against your existing passport.
  4. Consider future policy trends – Evaluate the likelihood of EU restrictions affecting the passport’s value and whether alternative residency options exist.
  5. Consult professional advice – Complex interactions between citizenship, tax law, and immigration regulations often require specialist guidance.

In summary, a second (or third) passport does not need to be chosen solely for its Schengen‑visa‑free count. Passports such as Armenian or Turkish, obtained through descent or investment, can provide strategic benefits—tax efficiency, quicker residency processes, and broader global access—while remaining insulated from potential EU policy tightening. Diversifying your passport portfolio with these considerations in mind can enhance personal and financial flexibility without relying on European travel privileges.