Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: The World’s Freest Economies in 2017: Winners and Losers

Oct 2, 2017Video Briefing8:32Watch on YouTube

The 2017 Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index provides a snapshot of how countries rank on a set of market‑friendly criteria, offering insight for entrepreneurs and investors seeking jurisdictions with low regulatory barriers, strong property rights, and favorable tax environments.

Overall Rankings

  • Top five (considered “very free”): Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland.
  • Broadly free: About 29 additional nations fall into the “largely free” category.
  • Bottom tier (the “usual suspects”): Venezuela, Eritrea, North Korea, plus a handful of other economies with severe restrictions on trade, investment, and personal freedoms.

Notable Movers

Category Countries Change Key Factors
Biggest Gainers Vanuatu, Romania, Belarus Significant upward movement Vanuatu’s liberal visa regime and offshore financial services; Romania’s recent reforms improving business climate; Belarus showing early signs of market liberalization (though still considered high‑risk).
Biggest Losers Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, United States Decline in rank Bahamas perceived as offering only “lip‑service” to investors; Bahrain and Barbados facing regulatory or fiscal setbacks; the United States slipping from 13th to 17th, largely due to rising business‑closure costs and tax complexity.
New Entrant to Top 20 Republic of Georgia Rose to 13th Aggressive reforms, streamlined company registration, and growing foreign investment interest.

United States: A Decline in Freedom

The United States fell from 13th place in previous editions to 17th in 2017. While still relatively easy for starting a business, the index highlights growing burdens such as:

  • Higher costs and procedural hurdles for closing a company.
  • Increasing tax compliance complexity, especially compared with jurisdictions that have flat‑rate or territorial tax systems.
  • A legal environment that, despite strong property rights, imposes substantial litigation risk for small‑scale entrepreneurs.

These trends suggest that the U.S. may soon exit the top‑20, prompting business owners to consider alternative bases of operation.

Georgia’s Rapid Rise

Georgia’s ascent to 13th reflects a series of reforms that have attracted attention from the diplomatic and investment communities:

  • One‑stop‑shop company registration that can be completed in days.
  • Low corporate tax rates (5 % on distributed profits) and a territorial tax system that exempts foreign‑source income.
  • Minimal bureaucracy for obtaining work permits and residency, making it attractive for digital nomads and small‑scale exporters.

Limitations of the Index

The Heritage Foundation methodology emphasizes macro‑economic freedoms—trade openness, regulatory efficiency, rule of law, and fiscal health. Critics note that:

  • The index may over‑value large‑scale industrial capacity (e.g., factories, heavy manufacturing) while under‑representing the needs of micro‑businesses and freelancers.
  • Countries with strong rule‑of‑law scores (e.g., Australia, United States, Denmark) can still impose heavy compliance costs that affect small enterprises.
  • Some high‑ranking nations, such as Estonia, are marketed heavily as tax havens, yet their actual tax burden and compliance requirements may be higher than advertised.

Practical Takeaways for Entrepreneurs

  • Assess regulatory burden beyond the headline rank. Look at specific metrics like time to start/close a business, licensing fees, and local tax filing requirements.
  • Consider territorial tax regimes if your income is primarily earned abroad; jurisdictions like Georgia, Vanuatu, and certain Caribbean states may offer significant tax savings.
  • Watch for trend signals: a country’s rapid rise (e.g., Georgia) or decline (e.g., United States) can indicate upcoming policy shifts that affect long‑term business planning.
  • Diversify locations: rather than relying on a single “top‑free” country, evaluate a portfolio of jurisdictions that together provide market access, legal protection, and tax efficiency.

Risks to Keep in Mind

  • Political stability: Fast‑moving economies may experience sudden regulatory reversals; monitor local news and diplomatic advisories.
  • Banking access: Offshore jurisdictions sometimes face restrictions from major banks, affecting cash flow and credit lines.
  • Reputation: Operating in a jurisdiction labeled a “tax haven” can attract scrutiny from tax authorities in higher‑tax home countries.

The 2017 Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index underscores a shifting landscape where traditional “free” economies face increasing regulatory pressure, while smaller, reform‑driven nations gain prominence. For business owners, the key is to translate these macro trends into concrete decisions about where to incorporate, where to locate operations, and how to structure cross‑border income for optimal freedom and tax efficiency.