Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: 20 Reasons the USA is NOT #1 Anymore

Dec 12, 2021Video Briefing12:05Watch on YouTube

The United States is still a major economic and cultural force, yet a growing body of data shows that it no longer leads on many of the indicators that most people use to judge a country’s overall quality of life.

Key rankings where the United States falls behind

  • Infant mortality – 34th out of 44 developed nations (per 100 000 live births).
  • Median household income – 4th of 36 developed economies, but the gap is narrowing as countries such as Ireland improve.
  • Murder rate – 89th of 230 countries (only 88 nations have a lower homicide rate).
  • Life expectancy – 46th of 193 countries, placing the U.S. well below the top tier.
  • Student math performance – 39th of 71 advanced economies.
  • CO₂ emissions & health‑care costs – ranked among the worst 20 countries for combined emissions and health‑care spending.
  • Suicide rate – 9th highest among 26 surveyed nations.
  • Poverty prevalence – 127th of 172 countries measured, indicating a relatively high share of the population living in poverty.
  • Overall crime index – 56th of 137 countries.
  • Happiness – 24th of 95 surveyed nations.
  • Internet speed – 12th of 180 countries; still far from the global leaders.
  • Obesity – 35th highest prevalence, reflecting a serious public‑health challenge.
  • Safety – 71st of 134 countries in global safety rankings.
  • Passport strength – roughly in the top 40, comparable to some lower‑ranking nations after recent travel‑restriction adjustments.
  • Military size – 3rd largest force out of 149 countries, a costly asset that does not translate into higher domestic well‑being.
  • Prisoner population per capita – #1 in the world.
  • International patent applications – 2nd of 154 countries, showing strong innovation despite other shortcomings.
  • Doctorates per capita – 4th of 35, another area of relative strength.
  • Automobile market size – 2nd largest of 10 major markets, though vehicle costs are high.

What the numbers imply

  • Economic freedom vs. cost – While the U.S. still offers a large consumer market and robust patent protection, high taxes, rising living costs, and a sizable incarcerated population erode the net benefit to residents.
  • Health and safety – Poor rankings in infant mortality, life expectancy, suicide, and crime suggest that personal security and public‑health outcomes lag behind many peers.
  • Education and human capital – The U.S. remains strong in higher‑education output (doctorates, patents) but underperforms in basic math proficiency, indicating uneven educational quality.
  • Quality‑of‑life trade‑offs – High internet speeds and a vibrant innovation ecosystem are offset by lower happiness scores, higher obesity rates, and a relatively weak safety record.

Practical considerations for individuals and investors

  • Assess tax burden versus services – Compare the effective tax rate and the public services received (healthcare, social safety nets) with those in countries such as Denmark or other European nations that rank higher on welfare metrics.
  • Factor in safety and health – If personal security and health outcomes are priorities, nations with lower homicide rates, higher life expectancy, and better public‑health indicators may be more attractive.
  • Leverage innovation strengths – For businesses focused on R&D and patents, the U.S. still offers a top‑tier environment, but remote‑work flexibility allows firms to locate operations where tax and regulatory regimes are more favorable.
  • Consider lifestyle metrics – High obesity and suicide rates point to broader societal stresses; lifestyle‑oriented expatriates may prefer countries with better health and well‑being scores.

Overall, the United States continues to excel in certain economic and innovative domains, yet a comprehensive review of health, safety, education, and social metrics reveals that it is no longer the undisputed “number one” country across the board. Decision‑makers should weigh these data points against personal priorities and the comparative advantages of alternative jurisdictions.