Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist R&D: Are Golden Visas Dying Off?

Feb 13, 2025Video Briefing15:48Watch on YouTube

The market for “golden visas” – residence permits granted in exchange for a sizable investment – is shifting. While some programs are being phased out, a range of alternatives remains across Europe, the Middle East, and Latin America.

What a golden visa is

A golden visa is an immigration pathway that grants residency (not citizenship) to foreign investors. Typical qualifying investments include:

  • Real‑estate purchases
  • Bank deposits or government bonds
  • Equity in a local company or venture fund

Unlike citizenship‑by‑investment schemes, the holder retains their original passport and gains only the right to live (and often work) in the host country.

Recent changes

Country Status (2024‑2025) Key Investment Options Notable Tax Regime
Spain Program cancelled effective Jan 2025, but applications accepted until 3 Apr 2025 Real‑estate, bank deposits, Spanish government debt Beckham Law – up to 6 years with a quasi‑territorial tax: foreign‑source income tax‑free, Spanish‑source salary taxed at 24 % (rising to 47 % above €600 k)
Portugal Real‑estate route removed; only investment‑fund options remain Qualified investment funds (minimum €500 k) Previously offered the Non‑Habitual Resident (NHR) regime; now largely unavailable except for rare cases
Latvia Active Real‑estate from €250 k Standard EU tax rules; residency can be maintained with minimal physical presence
Greece Active Real‑estate (high six‑figure euros) Lump‑sum tax regime for high‑net‑worth residents
United Arab Emirates Active (residence only) Real‑estate, company formation, term deposits No citizenship except for exceptional talent; long‑term residence permits available
Panama Active Real‑estate (~US$300 k) or other qualified investments Territorial tax system – only Panama‑source income taxed
Dominican Republic Active Investment via company formation, real‑estate (~US$200 k) Territorial tax; fast‑track citizenship possible within a year
Uruguay Active Real‑estate > US$500 k; 60 days/year residency for tax purposes Tax residency achievable with limited stay; citizenship by exception only

Practical considerations

  • Application windows – Spain’s final deadline is 3 April 2025. Applicants must act quickly if that market is preferred.
  • Physical‑presence requirements – Most programs allow minimal stay (e.g., 60 days/year in Uruguay, once every two years in Panama) to maintain residency.
  • Path to citizenship
    • Portugal still offers a relatively straightforward route to EU citizenship after five years of residence, though the tax advantages have narrowed.
    • Spain can grant citizenship after two years of lawful residence for Ibero‑American nationals, leveraging the Beckham Law’s tax benefits.
    • Greece and other Mediterranean programs have longer or more restrictive citizenship pathways, often requiring language proficiency or ethnic ties.
  • Tax implications
    • The Beckham Law makes Spain attractive for high‑income earners with substantial foreign‑source income.
    • Greece’s lump‑sum tax and Panama’s territorial system provide predictable tax liabilities for investors focused on non‑local income.
    • Portugal’s NHR regime is largely closed to new applicants, limiting its appeal.
  • Economic impact – Critics argue that foreign investors can drive up local property prices, contributing to housing shortages. Proponents note increased consumption, job creation, and support for local businesses from affluent residents.
  • Risk of program termination – Legislative changes can abruptly end or alter programs (as seen with Spain and Portugal). Investors should assess the likelihood of future policy shifts and consider diversification across jurisdictions.

Choosing a program

  1. Define objectives – residency only, tax optimization, or a fast track to EU citizenship?
  2. Assess investment capacity – real‑estate thresholds range from €250 k (Latvia) to high six‑figure euros (Greece).
  3. Consider tax residency goals – territorial systems (Panama, Dominican Republic) suit those with primarily foreign income; quasi‑territorial regimes (Spain) benefit high‑income earners with diversified portfolios.
  4. Evaluate political stability and future policy risk – programs with recent legislative scrutiny (Spain, Portugal) may carry higher uncertainty.
  5. Plan for physical‑presence obligations – ensure the required stay aligns with personal or business commitments.

Golden‑visa programs are not disappearing wholesale; they are evolving. While some European options are tightening, viable alternatives remain worldwide, offering residency, tax advantages, and, in several cases, a pathway to citizenship. Prospective investors should act promptly where deadlines exist and conduct thorough due‑diligence on each jurisdiction’s legal and fiscal framework.