Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: Have a Global Business? Hire in Emerging Markets

Jun 24, 2020Video Briefing9:08Watch on YouTube

Hiring staff in Western countries is becoming increasingly complex and costly due to new tax and labor regulations. Entrepreneurs who operate internationally are therefore looking to offshore their workforce to jurisdictions with fewer restrictions, lower employment taxes, and incentives for foreign employers.

Recent regulatory changes that tighten hiring in the West

  • United Kingdom – A new tax provision forces many contractors back onto the Pay‑As‑You‑Earn (PAYE) system, making it harder for offshore firms to engage UK‑based contractors without incurring higher payroll taxes and compliance burdens.
  • United States (California) – Strict contractor classification rules impose heavy penalties for mis‑labeling workers, increase paperwork, and push companies toward full‑time employment with associated benefits and taxes.
  • General trend – Several Western jurisdictions are moving to limit the use of independent contractors, requiring employers to provide employee‑level benefits and to meet more rigorous reporting requirements. This raises the cost of maintaining a small overseas team that remains on a Western payroll.

Incentives for hiring in non‑Western jurisdictions

Country Program / Incentive Typical Benefits for Employers
Serbia Large‑employer tax break Substantial reduction in payroll taxes for companies hiring 100–200 employees; possible additional perks.
Turkey Citizenship‑by‑investment Path to citizenship for investors who create jobs locally.
Portugal Residency for job creators Residency permits granted to firms that employ Portuguese workers.
Bulgaria Permanent residency Residency options tied to hiring local staff.
Armenia, Ukraine, Philippines, Egypt, Venezuela Low‑cost labor markets Wage levels 70‑90 % lower than in the West; minimal employment taxes and streamlined hiring processes.

These programs are designed to attract foreign businesses by lowering the overall cost of labor, reducing bureaucratic overhead, and, in some cases, offering residency or citizenship benefits to the employer’s owners.

Practical considerations when offshoring staff

  • Cost comparison – Salaries in many emerging markets can be a fraction of Western rates, while the employer’s tax burden is also reduced. This can allow firms to pay “above‑market” rates locally, improving employee retention.
  • Regulatory simplicity – Fewer filing requirements and lower risk of litigation make it easier to manage a remote team.
  • Talent quality – While some markets may have limited pools of highly specialized workers, many entrepreneurs report finding diligent, hard‑working staff willing to grow with the company.
  • Ethical and legal compliance – Paying extremely low wages or neglecting worker protections can lead to reputational damage and legal exposure. Companies should ensure contracts meet local labor standards and provide fair compensation.
  • Tax residency and reporting – Even when staff are located abroad, the home country may still impose reporting obligations (e.g., Form 5471 in the U.S. for foreign subsidiaries). Consulting with international tax professionals remains essential.

Decision criteria for choosing a hiring location

  1. Regulatory environment – Assess the stability of labor laws and the likelihood of future tightening.
  2. Tax impact – Compare payroll taxes, social security contributions, and any available incentives.
  3. Talent availability – Evaluate the local skill set relative to the roles you need to fill.
  4. Operational costs – Include office space, utilities, and administrative overhead in the cost model.
  5. Risk profile – Consider political stability, currency volatility, and potential for legal disputes.

Risks and caveats

  • Changing legislation – Countries that currently offer incentives may revise them, especially if they attract large numbers of foreign employers.
  • Currency fluctuations – Paying salaries in a volatile local currency can affect budgeting and profitability.
  • Cultural and communication barriers – Time‑zone differences and language gaps may require additional management resources.
  • Reputation management – Perceptions of “offshoring for cheap labor” can affect brand image, particularly if labor standards are not upheld.

By weighing these factors, entrepreneurs can determine whether moving staff offshore aligns with their tax strategy, operational goals, and ethical standards, while avoiding the growing compliance burdens present in many Western jurisdictions.