Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: These Passports Let You Pay Just 1% Tax

Jun 28, 2026Video Briefing18:59Watch on YouTube

Some countries may allow foreign nationals to combine a strong travel passport with relatively low taxation while living there and working toward citizenship. The main routes discussed are not instant citizenship programs, ancestry claims, or marriage-based options, but residence-based paths where the applicant relocates, establishes tax residence, and naturalizes over time.

Ireland

Ireland can be tax-friendly for some foreign residents who qualify as non-domiciled taxpayers. Under this structure, foreign companies and foreign investments are generally not taxed in Ireland unless money is remitted into Ireland, with limited exceptions.

A possible planning approach is to move liquidity into Ireland before becoming resident, then live from those pre-remitted funds while leaving foreign business and investment income outside Ireland.

Ireland’s appeal includes:

  • European Union citizenship after naturalization;
  • access to the UK through the Common Travel Area;
  • a five-year naturalization track;
  • the possibility of holding multiple citizenships;
  • English-language environment;
  • strong international credibility.

Ireland closed its Immigrant Investor Programme, so one practical route discussed is moving through a critical skills pathway, including by being employed by one’s own company where possible. The Irish company may pay some tax, and salary paid in Ireland can be taxed heavily, with a top effective rate described as around 52% when levies are included.

For a person with a larger foreign business or investment structure, the Irish tax cost may still be low relative to total global income. The example given was someone paying roughly €30,000 to €50,000 per year while foreign business and investment income remains outside Ireland. If the person earns €1 million per year abroad, the effective tax rate could fall into the low single digits; for multi-million-euro income, it could potentially approach 1%, depending on structure.

The caveat is that the applicant must genuinely live in Ireland for the naturalization period. The country is described as somewhat flexible, but the person still needs to spend a majority of the time there.

Cyprus

Cyprus is another European Union option with a non-dom tax system. It is presented as simpler and more crypto-friendly than Ireland, especially for Bitcoin or other crypto gains.

A Cyprus passport gives EU freedom of movement, meaning the person could later live elsewhere in the European Union. The main travel limitation noted is that Cyprus is still one of the EU countries without US ESTA access, though the transcript says this may change in the future.

The ordinary naturalization path is described as seven years of residence out of the last ten. A faster route may be available in as little as three years for applicants who meet additional criteria, including basic Greek language ability and other qualifications such as education or productivity-related criteria.

Cyprus may also allow tax residence without requiring the person to live there for most of the year, giving more mobility while maintaining a recognized tax base. However, simply holding residence without living there does not build a citizenship case.

A European tax residence can be useful in compliance-heavy banking environments. The transcript notes that banks in places such as Andorra and Liechtenstein may be more comfortable with Irish or Cypriot tax residents than with residents of more exotic low-tax jurisdictions. The trade-off is that European tax residence can also create restrictions with some financial institutions, including banks that do not want to handle European regulatory burdens.

Why Malta is different

Malta also has non-dom tax benefits, but it is not presented as the same kind of move-and-naturalize option.

Malta’s ordinary route to citizenship takes longer than Ireland or Cyprus. It also has an exceptional citizenship-by-merit route, but the transcript describes this as requiring a seven-figure commitment. That makes Malta more relevant for people willing to make a large investment rather than those seeking a low-tax residence path that naturally leads to citizenship through time spent in the country.

Chile

Chile is presented as a South American option with a strong passport and a temporary tax advantage for new residents.

The transcript describes a three-year tax holiday under which only Chilean-source income is taxable. Foreign-source capital gains, crypto gains, stocks held on non-Chilean platforms, and foreign businesses are described as outside Chilean tax during that period.

Chile has a five-year naturalization timeline, but applicants seeking citizenship may need to spend more time in the country than is required simply to keep a residence permit.

A rentista residence permit may be kept without living in Chile full-time, but that does not meaningfully accumulate time toward citizenship. For citizenship planning, the person must actually live there. If the tax holiday cannot be extended, years four and five may involve Chilean tax exposure.

Chile’s passport is described as unusually strong because it has visa-free access to the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Russia, and China. It also connects the holder to South America through MERCOSUR-related mobility privileges, though not at the same level as EU freedom of movement.

Chile may appeal to people who want a developed-country lifestyle, lower tax exposure for a period, and a passport from a region far from major geopolitical conflict zones, with access to food, water, and regional mobility.

Monaco

Monaco is the bonus option, but it is harder and slower. The naturalization timeline is described as 12 years or more, and citizenship is discretionary.

Monaco offers visa-free access to almost every country, including the United States through ESTA. However, obtaining residence requires:

  • renting or buying property;
  • placing money in a bank;
  • passing bank due diligence;
  • actually spending time in Monaco.

Banks are central to the process. The transcript notes that Monaco outsources much of the first layer of due diligence to banks, and a weak or unusual tax residence may make onboarding harder. One bank example mentioned required a €3 million deposit and was more open to quasi-exotic tax residences.

Monaco also monitors whether residents actually live there, because the country does not want people using the tax system without maintaining a genuine presence.

The transcript presents Monaco as better suited to retired or mostly passive investors than active business operators. A person with US dividend income may still face 30% US withholding tax, making Monaco or Dubai less attractive than a higher-tax European country with a better tax treaty. A person actively running a complex international business may also find that Monaco’s rules make a zero-tax outcome difficult.

The key warning is that headline tax rates are not enough. The real outcome depends on income source, treaty access, business activity, residence rules, and banking acceptance.

Other possible routes

The transcript also mentions island-based routes that can lead to European citizenship.

British overseas territories, such as the Cayman Islands and other Caribbean territories, may in some cases provide a path toward British citizenship while living outside the UK in lower-tax jurisdictions.

Dutch citizenship may also be possible through certain Caribbean territories connected to the Netherlands, including the ABC islands near Venezuela, though the low-tax angle is described as less clear.

These options are mentioned as separate topics and are not detailed in the transcript.

Main planning lesson

A strong passport with low taxation is possible in some cases, but the route depends on how the person’s income is structured, whether they are willing to live in the country, and whether the target passport fits their wider portfolio.

The main trade-offs are:

  • citizenship timelines versus tax savings;
  • real residence versus back-pocket residence permits;
  • European tax credibility versus financial regulation;
  • headline tax rate versus actual withholding and treaty outcomes;
  • passive investment income versus active business income;
  • fast investment citizenship versus slower residence-based naturalization;
  • travel strength versus lifestyle and compliance burden.

Ireland, Cyprus, Chile, and Monaco are presented as examples of places where a person may reduce tax exposure while working toward a strong passport. Ireland and Cyprus offer EU citizenship routes, Chile offers a strong non-European passport with broad travel access, and Monaco offers prestige and low personal tax but with a longer, more difficult citizenship path.