Video Briefing

IMI Daily: What Happens When You Try to Sell CBI Real Estate

Feb 15, 2026Video Briefing8:59Watch on YouTube

Investors who purchase property to obtain citizenship‑by‑investment (CBI) often discover that exiting the investment is far more difficult—and less profitable—than the initial purchase suggests. The resale dynamics differ dramatically across the three largest CBI real‑estate markets: the Caribbean, Turkey, and Egypt.

Caribbean: Limited Buyer Pool and Low Resale Values

Five Caribbean nations—St. Kitts & Nevis, Antigua & Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, and St. Lucia—offer citizenship through either titled properties (direct ownership) or preferred shares in resort developments. Both formats share a fundamental flaw:

  • Buyer pool is almost exclusively other CBI applicants. Regular investors, tourists, and local buyers rarely compete at the high price points required for the programs.
  • Resale prices are driven by fresh program minimums. A new investor can acquire a qualifying unit for the program’s minimum (e.g., $200 k in Dominica). Consequently, a used unit rarely commands a premium; many sellers receive offers far below their original outlay. An example cited a $200 k share being bought back for only $80 k.
  • Holding periods lock investors in for years. Antigua & Barbuda require a five‑year lock‑in; St. Kitts & Nevis extends to seven years. By the time the lock‑in expires, newer inventory has entered the market, further depressing resale values.
  • Developers and CBI advisers have little incentive to market secondary sales. Their commissions are tied to new sales, not to reselling existing units.

Data transparency is poor; only Grenada publishes transaction statistics (366 deals worth ~ 143 million EC$ in H1 2025). Overall, Caribbean CBI real estate should be viewed as a passport purchase with property attached, not a conventional investment.

Turkey: A Liquid Real‑Estate Market

Turkey’s CBI program operates within a comparatively transparent and active property market:

  • Price indices are published by the central bank. In December 2025, national residential prices rose 29 % YoY (nominal Lira), while real, inflation‑adjusted returns fell 1.4 %. Istanbul alone saw a 28.5 % nominal increase.
  • High transaction volume. 1.7 million house sales in 2025 (up 14.3 % YoY); Istanbul accounted for 280 000 units. Foreign buyers purchased ~21 500 properties nationwide, ~8 000 in Istanbul—about 1.3 % of total activity.
  • Resale behaves like any other Turkish property. CBI‑eligible units are not “re‑cycled” for subsequent applicants, but because foreign buyers represent a tiny slice of the market, the impact on resale liquidity is negligible.
  • Currency risk dominates. Gains in Lira can be substantial if the Lira remains stable against the dollar, but exchange‑rate swings can erase local price appreciation.

Thus, Turkish CBI real estate offers a resale environment similar to that faced by domestic investors, with the added exposure to currency fluctuations.

Egypt: Strong Domestic Demand, Minimal CBI Impact

Egypt’s housing sector is driven by robust internal demand:

  • Rapid construction growth. Cairo delivered 32 000 homes in 2025 (up 34 % YoY); the New Administrative Capital’s R7 district alone completed ~7 500 units in a single quarter. Projects such as “Nightfrank” anticipate ~100 000 units by 2028.
  • Aggressive financing. Local banks provide easy leverage, facilitating quick turnover.
  • CBI program adds little to market dynamics. Since September 2023 the program opened to all inventory, but developers already sell to Egyptian buyers without needing citizenship‑linked paperwork. Consequently, CBI‑linked sales generate minimal extra commissions.

Resale performance follows the same determinants as any Egyptian property—location, development quality, timing, and macro‑economic conditions—while currency risk mirrors that of Turkey.

Practical Takeaways for Prospective CBI Investors

  1. Assess the underlying real‑estate market, not just the passport benefit.
    • If the property would not be attractive without the citizenship incentive, the investment is likely overpriced.
  2. Consider liquidity and holding periods.
    • Caribbean programs lock investors for 5–7 years, during which market conditions can shift dramatically.
  3. Factor in currency exposure.
    • Both Turkey and Egypt expose investors to exchange‑rate risk that can magnify or erase nominal price gains.
  4. Explore alternative CBI routes.
    • Many programs also accept donations, public‑market investments, or bank deposits, which may offer better risk‑adjusted returns than real‑estate purchases.

In summary, while citizenship‑by‑investment programs promise a fast track to a second passport, the real‑estate component often behaves very differently across regions. Caribbean schemes are constrained by a narrow resale market and developer‑driven pricing, whereas Turkey and Egypt provide more conventional property dynamics but introduce significant currency considerations. Prospective buyers should treat the property purchase as a secondary benefit to the passport, not the primary investment.