Video Briefing

Nomad Capitalist: The Worst Western Countries (Interview with Jason Pizzino)

Aug 1, 2021Video Briefing10:25Watch on YouTube

The western “developed” economies that most digital nomads and high‑net‑worth individuals compare often share a common trajectory: rising taxes, tighter capital‑controls, and increasingly coordinated regulatory approaches. While none of them can be called the absolute worst, several stand out for policies that make them especially unfriendly to entrepreneurs, crypto investors, and frequent travelers.

Australia – High taxes and a “no‑exit” penalty

  • Tax burden: Marginal income tax rates can exceed 40 % for high earners, and the tax system remains aggressive even for residents who have moved abroad.
  • Re‑entry restrictions: Leaving the country can trigger fines and bureaucratic hurdles if you later try to return, effectively penalising citizens who seek to work overseas.
  • Business impact: The combination of high personal tax rates and limited freedom of movement makes long‑term remote‑work or expatriation costly and administratively painful.

New Zealand – Shifting from tax‑friendly to enforcement‑heavy

  • Historical advantage: Previously marketed as a low‑tax, crypto‑friendly jurisdiction.
  • Recent changes: Authorities are tightening tax enforcement, discussing inheritance and wealth taxes, and signaling a move toward the same “big‑government” model seen in other Five‑Eyes nations.
  • Result: The perceived tax advantage is eroding, and the regulatory environment is becoming less predictable for high‑income individuals.

United States – Unreliable policy and expanding top‑earner taxes

  • Policy volatility: Frequent legislative changes create uncertainty for businesses operating in emerging sectors such as cryptocurrency.
  • Targeted taxes: New proposals aim at the top 0.3 % of earners, adding additional layers of tax on capital gains, wealth, and even crypto transactions.
  • Reliability issue: The lack of a stable, long‑term regulatory framework makes the U.S. a less attractive base for entrepreneurs who need certainty.

United Kingdom – Mixed picture, but not the worst

  • Tax opportunities: Non‑resident status and certain overseas territories (e.g., Jersey, Gibraltar) can provide relatively favourable tax treatment if structured correctly.
  • Quality of life: Still ranks high for infrastructure and services, though recent policy shifts hint at higher taxes for high earners.
  • Overall: The UK is not the most punitive, but it is not immune to the broader Western trend toward higher taxation.

Canada – Not highlighted as a major problem, but shares the same regional trends as its neighbours, with progressive tax rates and increasing regulatory scrutiny on digital assets.

Singapore – The most attractive among the listed options

  • Tax regime: Low personal income tax rates, no capital gains tax, and a clear stance toward crypto businesses.
  • Stability: Strong rule of law and a predictable regulatory environment make it a preferred hub for high‑net‑worth individuals seeking both financial and personal freedom.

Emerging alternatives outside the West

  • Malaysia: English‑speaking environment, relatively open business climate, and a “grit” that appeals to digital nomads.
  • Balkans and Latin America (e.g., Serbia, Georgia, Medellín): Offer a softer regulatory touch, lower cost of living, and fewer intrusive tax measures, providing a sense of greater personal freedom compared with Western nations.

Key takeaways for high‑income nomads

  1. Assess total tax exposure: Look beyond headline rates; consider exit taxes, wealth‑tax proposals, and enforcement intensity.
  2. Prioritise regulatory certainty: Jurisdictions with stable, transparent rules (e.g., Singapore) reduce compliance risk for crypto and digital businesses.
  3. Watch regional cooperation: The Five‑Eyes alliance means policy ideas often migrate across Australia, New Zealand, the U.K., Canada, and the U.S., amplifying the impact of any single country’s changes.
  4. Consider non‑Western hubs: Nations with lower tax burdens and less coordinated enforcement can provide a more sustainable environment for long‑term wealth preservation and entrepreneurial activity.

In summary, while no western developed country can be labeled the absolute worst, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States currently present the most significant obstacles for high‑earning digital nomads and crypto investors. Singapore stands out as the most tax‑friendly and stable option among the traditional English‑speaking economies, and emerging jurisdictions in Asia, the Balkans, and Latin America offer compelling alternatives for those seeking greater personal and fiscal freedom.